In the context of globalization, there are currently four primary methods for resolving international trade disputes in Vietnam: negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and court litigation. Each method has its own advantages and limitations, suitable for different types and complexities of disputes.
1. Negotiation: This is the most common method, allowing the parties to reach an agreement on their own without a third party’s involvement. It is simple, cost-effective, and helps maintain business confidentiality.
2. Mediation: Similar to negotiation, this method involves a third-party mediator who assists the parties in finding a solution but does not have the authority to make a final decision. Mediation is voluntary, flexible, and helps preserve relationships between the parties.
3. Arbitration: Under the 2010 Commercial Arbitration Law, the parties may choose arbitration for dispute resolution. An arbitral award is final and binding but can be annulled in specific circumstances. Arbitration allows for a swift, flexible process agreed upon by the parties.
4. Court Litigation: As the most coercive method, court litigation follows legal procedures and regulations. Court decisions are enforceable by law and can be appealed, though litigation is often more complex, time-consuming, and costly.
Understanding these methods enables businesses to select the most appropriate approach, thereby protecting their legitimate rights in international trade.
View the full publication information HERE.